Third-party fairness maintenance in five types of group relationships

Main Article Content

Zhuang Li
Gengdan Hu
Lei Xu
Yang Rui
Cite this article:  Li, Z., Hu, G., Xu, L., & Rui, Y. (2021). Third-party fairness maintenance in five types of group relationships. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 49(2), e9724.


Abstract
Full Text
References
Tables and Figures
Acknowledgments
Author Contact

To find out if third-party fairness maintenance is affected by group relationships, we divided participants into three groups and had them play a game of third-party fairness maintenance, in which a third party chooses between keeping (not intervening), punishing, or compensating, when the other players face unfair dictator game results. Results show that when faced with in-group unfair events, the third party tended to choose keeping or compensating strategies, and to opt not to intervene in the unfair events of the out-group. This tendency was stronger when both the dictator and the recipient belonged to the same out-group. In addition, there was intergroup bias in maintenance of third-party fairness. When the violator was an in-group member, the third party tended to use keep and compensate strategies, and chose to punish when facing violation by the out-group. Our findings illustrate the influence of group relationships on third-party fairness maintenance.

Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.

Article Details

© 2021 Scientific Journal Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.