How multiple reference points influence managers' post-decisional regret

Main Article Content

Wen-Hsien Huang
Li-Jung Tseng
Cite this article:  Huang, W.-H., & Tseng, L.-J. (2007). How multiple reference points influence managers' post-decisional regret. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 35(4), 487-498.


Abstract
Full Text
References
Tables and Figures
Acknowledgments
Author Contact

Although regret is the most relevant emotion in the domain of decision making, research addressing the regrets of managers and how these are influenced by multiple reference points is lacking. In the context of a choice set with more than 2 alternatives, this study demonstrates that sales managers evaluated their postdecisional regrets based on three reference points: the best-performing unchosen outcome, the worst-performing unchosen outcome, and their expected outcome. The first 2 are social comparison-based standards and the last is a temporal comparison-based standard. Managers equally favored social comparison and temporal standard information when assessing their postdecisional regrets. In addition, it was found that the feeling of regret was largely influenced by a loss or gain relative to each reference point rather than by the degree of loss or gain.

Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.

Article Details

© 2007 Scientific Journal Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.