The reliability and validity of Bem and Allen's measure of cross-situational consistency
Main Article Content
Cite this article:
Greaner, J., &
Penner, L. A.
(1982). The reliability and validity of Bem and Allen's measure of cross-situational consistency.
Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal,
10(2),
241-244.
Abstract
Full Text
References
Tables and Figures
Acknowledgments
Author Contact
The reliability and validity of Bem and Allen's (1974) technique of measuring cross-situational consistency was investigated. Subjects answered questions concerning consistency in academic behavior and general consistency and filled out Snyder's (1974) Self-monitoring Scale twice. Whereas the test-retest reliability of the Bem and Allen type questions was quite low, the reliability of the Self-monitoring Scale was relatively high. The correlation between self-reports of variability in academic behaviour and actual variability in grades was significant, while the correlation between self-reports of general consistency and self-monitoring scores was not. The problem of using a single-item technique to measure consistency was discussed.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Article Details
© 1982 Scientific Journal Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.